|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
General information |
|
| |
| Name |
IN COMMISSION - PTC for nitrate production
|
|
| Country installed |
Chile
|
|
| Address |
Calama, Chile
|
|
| Industry sector, NACE code |
B - Mining and quarrying
|
|
| Solar thermal system owner / operator |
|
|
| Solar thermal engineering company |
Protarget AG
|
|
| Process integration engineering company |
|
|
| Year of operation start |
2023
|
|
| |
Technical parameters |
|
| |
| Collector technology |
parabolic trough collector
|
|
| Collector name |
|
|
| Installed collector area (gross), m² |
1070.0
|
|
| Installed collector area (aperture), m² |
|
|
| Installed collector area (absorber), m² |
|
|
| Installed thermal power (actual), kWth |
750.0
|
|
| Solar collector loop heat transfer fluid |
|
|
| Solar energy storage |
other
|
|
| Storage volume, m³ |
|
|
| Kind of conventional heat source |
|
|
| Kind of fuel used |
|
|
| |
Process |
|
| |
| Solar thermal energy used for |
process steam to nitrate production
|
|
| Unit operation |
general process heating
|
|
| Point of Solar Heat Integration |
B1) Heating of process(es) / process vessel(s)
|
|
| --> Integration how and where |
|
|
| --> Temperature range process |
|
|
| --> Temperature range solar loop (min/max), C° |
220
|
|
| |
Economic parameters |
|
| |
| Total investment costs (excl. VAT), € |
1.00
(Turnkey costs including solar collectors, piping, support construction, storage, design, commissioning reduced with subsidies)
|
|
| Solar loop (excl. VAT), € |
(Solar collectors, piping, support construction)
|
|
| Solar energy storage (excl. VAT), € |
|
|
| Others (excl. VAT), € |
(Design, commissioning, others)
|
|
| Process integration (excl. VAT), € |
|
|
| Subsidy, € or % of total investment costs |
not known
|
|
| Cost for fuel replaced, €/MWhfuel |
|
|
| Calculated solar thermal system life time, a |
|
|
| Annual useful solar heat delivery, MWh/a |
3049
|
|
| Specific annual useful solar heat delivery, MWh/am² |
2.85
|
|
| Specific investment costs, €/m² |
0.0
|
|
| Solar fraction, % |
|
|
| |
Lessons learned |
|
| |
| Initiative |
|
|
| Integration methodology |
|
|
| Crucial Interfaces |
|
|
| Construction / Commissioning |
|
|
| Operation / Performance |
Should have
Energy savings: 4.065 MWh/y
CO2 savings: 762 tons CO2/y
|
|
| Recommendations |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
SHIP Plants
